Gebruiker:Tom Kisters/Kladblok

{{FDC impact report|Status=Submitted|Date={{Template:{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}|1|3}}}}}}</nowiki> {{:FDC portal/Impact report form}}

Basic entity information

{ {FDC progress report form/1/Table/0 | legal name = Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland | fiscal = 01/01 - 12/31 | timeframe = 01/01/13 - 12/31/13 | contact name = Sandra Rientjes | contact position = Executive Director | user = SRientjes | email = rientjes@wikimedia.nl | second contact name = Tom Kisters | second contact position = Finances | second user = na | second email = finance@wikimedia.nl }}

Overview of the past year

The purpose of this section is to provide a brief overview of this report. Please use no more than 2–3 paragraphs to address the questions outlined below. You will have an opportunity to address these questions in detail elsewhere in this report.

• HIGHLIGHTS: What were 2–3 important highlights of the past year? (These may include successes, challenges, lessons learned.)
• SWOT: Reflecting on the context outlined for your entity in the FDC proposal, what were some of the contextual elements that either enabled or inhibited the plan?
  • Strengths: Organizational strengths that enabled the plan
  • Weaknesses: Organizational weaknesses that inhibited the plan
  • Opportunities: External opportunities that enabled the plan
  • Threats: Risks or threats that inhibited the plan
• WIKI-FOCUS: What Wikimedia projects was your entity focused on (e.g., Wiki Commons, French Wiktionary) this year?
• GROWTH: How did your entity grow over the past quarter vs. the previous quarter (e.g., Number of active editors reached/involved/added, number of articles created, number of events held, number of partipants reached through workshops)?

Response:

Financial summary

The FDC requires information about how your entity received and spent money over the past year. The FDC distributes general funds, so your entity is not required to use funds exactly as outlined in the proposal. While line-item expenses will not be examined, the FDC and movement wants to understand why the entity spent money in the way it did. If variance in budgeted vs. actual is greater than 20%, please provide explanation in more detail. This helps the FDC understand the rationale behind any significant changes. Note that any changes from the Grant proposal, among other things, must be consistent with the WMF mission, must be for charitable purposes as defined in the grant agreement, must be reported to WMF, and must otherwise comply with the grant agreement. The WMF mission is "to empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally."

Revenues

Provide exchange rate used:

{{FDC progress report form/1/Table/1/Header}} { {FDC progress report form/1/Table/1/Row | revenue source = Wikimedia Foundation | currency = EUROS | anticipated = 29150 | Q1 = 0 | Q2 = 0 | Q3 = 29150 | Q4 = 0 | cumulative = 29150 | anticipatedUS = 40536 | cumulativeUS = 40536 | explanation = K }} {{FDC progress report form/1/Table/1/End}}

Spending

{{FDC progress report form/1/Table/2/Header}} { {FDC progress report form/1/Table/2/Row | expense = A | currency = B | budgeted = C | Q1 = D | Q2 = E | Q3 = F | Q4 = G | cumulative = H | budgetedUS = I | cumulativeUS = J | percentage spent = J2 | explanation = K }} {{FDC progress report form/1/Table/2/End}}

Progress against past year's goals/objectives

The FDC needs to understand the impact of the initiatives your entity has implemented over the past year. Because the FDC distributes general funds, entities are not required to implement the exact initiatives proposed in the FDC proposal; the FDC expects each entity to spend money in the way it best sees fit to achieve its goals and those of the movement. However, please point out any significant changes from the original proposal, and the reasons for the changes. Note that any changes from the Grant proposal, among other things, must be consistent with the WMF mission, must be for charitable purposes as defined in the grant agreement, must be reported to WMF, and must otherwise comply with the grant agreement. The WMF mission is "to empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally."

Program 1

{ {FDC proposal/Program |key= Program title |overview=

What were the stated objectives of this program? Please use to explain these goals.

What is your progress against these objectives? (Include metrics and number of volunteers/staff involved.)

Which Wikimedia movement strategic priority (or priorities) did this program address and how?

What key activities were conducted and/or milestones achieved with this program?

If your entity did not achieve the desired objectives, why not? If it did, what enabled this? If the initiative was not in your plan, why did you pursue it?

Any additional details:

}}

Lessons learned

Lessons from the past

A key objective of the funding is to enable the movement as a whole to understand how to achieve shared goals better and faster. An important way of doing this is to identify lessons learned and insights from entities who receive funds, and to share these lessons across the movement. Please answer the following questions in 1–2 paragraphs each.

• What were your major accomplishments in the past year, and how did you help to achieve movement goals?

  Response:

1. The Amsterdam Hackathon: supported innovation, stabilizing infrastructure
2. Wikipedians in Residence: most just started, but effective in freeing content, supporting Wikipedians in activities.
3. Publicity and media contacts
4. Involving community in annual plan process.

• What were your major setbacks in the past year (e.g., programs that were not successful)?

  Response:

1. Editor retention after training sessions very low.
2. External fundraising. Slow to start, first successes only late in the year.
3. Small grants programme. Hardly any requests.

• What factors (organizational, environmental) enabled your success?

  Response:

1. Growing interest in/respect for Wikipedia and other WM projects among GLAMs
2. Small but highly motivated and experienced group of volunteers
3. Office focused on supporting community/volunteers
4. The FDC grant

• What unanticipated challenges did you encounter and how did this affect what you were able to accomplish?

  Response:

1. External fundraising more complicated than expected. Revenue smaller than budgetted. We combined activities, made optimal use of in-kind contributions by partners.

• What are the 2–3 most important lessons that other entities can learn from your experience?

  Response:

1. Contacts + relationship with Wikipedia community are key
2. Volunteers/community members are our customers, we should aim to serve them
3. Many GLAMs interested in cooperating: be selective and focus on deliverables for Wikimedia projects. Choose partners that are in it for the long haul, not just quick pr success.

Lessons for the future

The Wikimedia movement grows as each entity in the movement reflects and adapts its approaches to changing needs and contexts. The questions below encourage you to apply your thinking in the sections above of "how well have we done" and "what have we learned" to the development and execution of future organisational and program strategies. The questions below can be informed both by your own entities' learnings, as well as the learnings of other movement entities (e.g., adding a new program that appears to have caused significant impact in several other countries or communities).

• What organisational or program strategies would you continue?

  Response:

1. Wikipedians in residence
2. Supporting community in organising big events
3. Make active effort to engage community in developing annual plan
4. Survey stakeholder groups to assess needs (repeat Motivaction survey)

• What might you change in organisational and program strategies in order to improve the effectiveness of your entity?

  Response:

1. Thematic focus on programme of editathons and trainings to generate critical mass and avoid scattered, single events with little structural effect.Provide follow-up support for trainees.
2. Invest strongly in communicating with the Wikipedia community
3. Different approach to cooperation with other chapters in software development.(Europeana Glam Wiki mass upload...)

Stories of success and challenge

Of all the accomplishments highlighted through this report, please share two detailed case studies: one "story of success" and one story of challenge that your entity experienced over the past year (2–3 paragraphs). Provide any details that might be helpful to others in the movement on the context, strategy, and impact of this initiative.

Case study: success

Response: ? WCN: wide interest from outside the community ? Hackathon: excellent cooperation between community (programme development) and office (logistics) ? Wikipedia in Residence programme?

Case study: challenge

Response: Editor retention after training sessions.

Additional information

• What are some of the activities that are happening in your community that are not chapter-led? What are the most successful among these, and why?

  Response:

- Writing- events on Wikipedia: Poland, Sweden. High output of new articles.

• Provide any other relevant information that may be helpful or relevant for the FDC (e.g., links to any media coverage, blog posts, more detailed reports, more detailed financial information).

  Response:

Compliance

Is your organization compliant with the terms defined in the grant agreement?

1. As required in the grant agreement, please report any deviations from your grant proposal here. Note that, among other things, any changes must be consistent with our WMF mission, must be for charitable purposes as defined in the grant agreement, and must otherwise comply with the grant agreement.

   Response

2. Are you in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations as outlined in the grant agreement? Please answer "Yes" or "No".

   Response

3. Are you in compliance with provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), and with relevant tax laws and regulations restricting the use of the Grant funds as outlined in the grant agreement? Please answer "Yes" or "No".

   Response

Financial information

1. Report any Grant funds that are unexpended fifteen (15) months after the Effective Date of the Grant Agreement. These funds must be returned to WMF or otherwise transferred or deployed as directed by WMF.

   Response:

2. Any interest earned on the Grant funds by Grantee will be used by Grantee to support the Mission and Purposes as set out in this Grant Agreement. Please report any interest earned during the reporting period and cumulatively over the duration of the Grant and Grant Agreement.

   Response:

Signature

Once complete, please sign below with the usual four tildes.

{{#if:pagename=Impact report form preload/1|[[Categorie:FDC portal]]|<nowiki>{{FDC report categories}}}}</nowiki>