Overleg gebruiker:AntiCompositeNumber

Hello AntiCompositeNumber, welcome to the Dutch Wikipedia! Welkomstbericht in het Nederlands Thank you for participating in this community project. We would like to give you the opportunity to be free and productive. Here are a few directions that might help you: A collection of useful links in English can be found on Help:English. Please use our Sandbox (zandbak) for experimenting. Feel free to add your expertise to Wikipedians by interest, and to use our Babel templates (taalsjablonen) on your user page. Wikipedia has been an ongoing project for several years now. There have been discussions on many issues in the past. Please check the discussion pages (overlegpagina's) if you are in doubt about the contents of a given page. If you want to make a careful start editing in Dutch, try to expand some of our stubs (beginnetjes). Take care when editing someone else's work. Registered users can change the name of an article by using "Titel wijzigen". This method of renaming keeps the history (geschiedenis) of a page intact. Questions about Wikipedia or for help can be asked at the Helpdesk. To sign messages, use four tildes: ~~~~ More information (in Dutch) can be found on our conventions page and the wikiquette page.

Drummingman (overleg)‍ 28 aug 2022 00:37 (CEST)

'redact'

Hi AntiCompositeNumber, because of this: why did you do that and who prompted you to do it? And was it you who requested oversight? It was the user himself who exposed his IP. It is all over the Dutch Wikipedia, even in the heading of the request for a CheckUser, so what's the use of removing a remark that the check was positive and that no other sockpuppets were found? I'd like to see a lot more transparency here. WIKIKLAAS overleg 23 dec 2023 18:30 (CET)

Suppression is the tool of first resort when handling potential inappropriate releases of non-public data. AntiCompositeNumber (overleg) 24 dec 2023 04:07 (CET)

But did you do an assession whether this was really inappropriate or not? And who asked you to do it? I mean, you appeared here right out of the blue. I still would like to see much, much more transparency here as to what really happened. So, as this is not your home wiki: who prompted you to asses this, who asked for oversight, and which steward did the oversight, as I would really like to ask the steward to reverse it, because it absolutely was of no use? WIKIKLAAS overleg 24 dec 2023 04:27 (CET)

If you would like to ask for a steward action to be undone, you can email stewards@wikimedia.org. You do not need to know the specific steward to contact that email, though for this you could also email me. Obviously, we do not disclose nonpublic information other than in situations permitted by policy. Vermont (overleg) 24 dec 2023 05:24 (CET)

Obviously AntiCompositeNumber won the price for ineffectiveness. And in this case it really matters who did what and why. One cannot just undo some edits and hide them without giving justification when asked for it. WIKIKLAAS overleg 24 dec 2023 11:41 (CET)