Overleg gebruiker:Glooh

Hello Glooh, welcome to the Dutch Wikipedia! Welkomstbericht in het Nederlands Thank you for participating in this community project. We would like to give you the opportunity to be free and productive. Here are a few directions that might help you: A collection of useful links in English can be found on Help:English. Please use our Sandbox (zandbak) for experimenting. Feel free to add your expertise to Wikipedians by interest, and to use our Babel templates (taalsjablonen) on your user page. Wikipedia has been an ongoing project for several years now. There have been discussions on many issues in the past. Please check the discussion pages (overlegpagina's) if you are in doubt about the contents of a given page. If you want to make a careful start editing in Dutch, try to expand some of our stubs (beginnetjes). Take care when editing someone else's work. Registered users can change the name of an article by using "Titel wijzigen". This method of renaming keeps the history (geschiedenis) of a page intact. Questions about Wikipedia or for help can be asked at the Helpdesk. To sign messages, use four tildes: ~~~~ More information (in Dutch) can be found on our conventions page and the wikiquette page.

Billinghurst (overleg) 20 feb 2018 13:20 (CET)

Please also see Wikipedia:Wanneer extern linken to understand the local linking guidance. Billinghurst (overleg) 20 feb 2018 13:20 (CET)

Wikipedia email

Discussions about my actions are better discussed on wiki, rather than via personal email.

Beste Billinghurst,

Ik begrijp terdege de afweging van het verwijderen van al mijn meest recente aanvullingen, echter ik kies deze weloverwogen.

Een uitvoerige Nederlandstalige documentaire over de Geschiedenis van Jordanië die enkel en alleen beschikbaar is op reisreport.nl, is in mijn ogen daadwerkelijk een relevante bijdrage. In deze documentaire komt vrijwel de gehele geschiedenis voorbij, vanaf de Nabateeërs. Er is voor zover mij bekend nergens een dergelijke documentaire te vinden waar ook nog eens zoveel aandacht in onderzoek aan is besteed.

In welke variant zou dergelijke content onder de aandacht mogen worden gebracht naar uw idee? Als bronvermelding dan wellicht?

Met vriendelijk groet,

//name removed//

Thanks for the email. I think that important place to start is about that in editing our encyclopaedias we expect neutrality and conflict of interest editing to be managed. You show a tendency to just add the one domain in your editing 13 records; Domains added by Glooh: reisreport.nl (12), travelaffect.com (1) and predominantly you are the only person adding that links 13 records; Editors who have added reisreport.nl: Glooh (12), TNSE vanathi2010 krr (1). Now to the links that you have added, there is nothing demonstrably authoritative about the links; there are no references or citations or links to support the video, nor on the page, just that splash advertisement at the end. Everywhere else on out sites we expect citations and evidence/citation-supported works, and just due to your labelling it a documentary doesn't make it so without the documentation, or equivalent.

If you believe that I am too harsh in my assessment and removal, then please address it to the community at Help:Helpdesk. Billinghurst (overleg) 20 feb 2018 14:11 (CET)

Thanks for the repons! I've added a question at the Helpdesk and already received a useful tip how to move on with content and links alike. I'll dive into it to make sure to act properly.